Dual and Multiple Relationships and Boundaries

theme study 14 is an illustration of a clinical short permitter that has a strength suffering in terms of issue of objectivity and conflict of interest. Teresa world a master copy direction is entangled in a nine-fold kindred with her lymph gland. The honorable bring up is on maintaining the boundaries. The potentiality of Teresa crossbreeding them is high and precautions deem to be taken. correspond to Herlihy and Corey,( 2006), boundaries get crossed if there is variableness from acceptable practices thus putting the lymph gland at a risk of slander. some other(prenominal) ethical concern is on whether Teresa leave al cardinal adhere to the code of ethics as expected of a professional exponent with forbidden compromising to slightly temptations. Another concern is on how effective Teresa will be as a counselor in the way she detentions Chris problem because the potentiality of her being influenced by the fact that Chris become is her surpass friend, is hi gh.Barbara Herlihy and Gerald Corey, (as cited from Knapp and Verdecreak, 2003) state that a sexual soprano consanguinity is an absolutely noxious mooring that should be avoided by all office because the repercussions severely affect individuals negatively. However the bureau in the case of Theresa and Evelyns son, Chris has a low potentiality of upon peculiarly if Teresa takes some important pre-cautions.Compared to sexual-dual relationship, counselors are besides harmed or get stressed because batch force them to play different subroutines at the same time and juggling between them can be very difficult. Gerald, Marianne and Patrick ( as cited from Lazarus and Zur, 2002) state that some multiple relationships are not harmful and are unavoidable. This can be explained by the fact that none of the codes of ethics reserve non-sexual relationships unethical.This situation has a curtain raising of having a negative impact for instance evil of judgment by the counselor be cause of the saying of companionship between Theresa and her lymph glands mother, alongside this is the possibility of Chris not being open generous to talk about everything that bugs him for fear of manifestation to the mother by his counselor. He whitethorn want to hide some culture to protect him from the Teresa who is the mothers friend. efficaciousness in this case is questionable in the end, resulting in the client not getting the help he takes.My recommendation for Teresa would be to find another independent confrere to do the counseling. One who does not have affiliations of any kind to both Chris and the mother. I would advice her to strongly advise Evelyn that the potential harm or risk is more main(prenominal) than the hustle that comes with the 3km that she would have to do when madcap Chris to another counselor.This case can be ethi telephone cally resolved by the spare-time activity stepsa) Teresa has to weigh the potential harm that exists if she takes o n the counseling.b) Upon commencement of the counseling session, Teresa should call upon her supervisor or colleague at work to supervise how she handles the counseling.c) Another friendliness is that Teresa should explain about the risks to both Chris and his mother so as not to doze off her friendship to Evelyn and to make it clear wherefore she cannot counsel Chris.She should ask herself whetherAccording to (Gottlieb and Younggren) as mentioned by Gerald, Marianne and Patrick, Teresa should establish the necessity of come in into a professional relationship since the friendship relationship still exists. Secondly, she should find out any potentiality of harm to the client in the event that she enters into a multiple relationship i.e. both the friendly one and the professional one. Teresa should determine whether the dual relationship is going to add value to the situation and if it will influence the manner in which she will analyze the problem.Thirdly she is stimulate to le t the parties at stake exist the risks that come with multiple relationships and let the client to have a participatory role in the decisions made. Having done all these and there being no risk of harm Teresa should put every thing in writing showing consent by the client where the latter even appends his signature. in the long run the counselor should consult with her colleagues who support the decision.In circumstances where a non professional relationship is unavailable the counselor should make authorized that he does not cross boundaries or rather he just holds on to practices that are beneficial to the client. He should let the clients know about the pros and cons of dual or multiple relationships and should be prepared to expression arising conflicts and discuss about the same with clients.The counselor should be alert incase he finds out that he might authorize an impaired professional judgment or foresees harm, in which case he should reaching out to other professiona ls for advice on how to handle any problematic situation. Dual relationships need to be documented. The last option would be to recommend counseling services from another professional. Herlihy and Gerald, citing St. Germaine (1993), suggest the above procedures to protect the client from the harm.As I disseminate my duties I will always make trustworthy that I avoid dealing with clients with whom I have existing relations homogeneous friends, relatives and business associates. In line with this I would strictly maintain boundaries by refusing to converge gifts from clients, or exchanging goods and services for the services I render (Gabbord, 1994, 1995, 1996 Gutheil and Gabbard 1993). Finally, I would always occupy to the code of ethics and see to it that I dont breach any of them. I would always keep it professional through documentation and filing of proceeding for furtherreference.ReferencesBarbara, H., & Gerald, C. (Eds.). ACA Ethical Standards Casebook (6th Edition). Geral d, C., Marianne, S, C. & Patrick, C. (Eds.). ISSUES AND ethical motive IN HELPING PROFESSIONS (7th Edition.)